I have been a Make magazine subscriber for over 3 years. I really enjoyed reading it with my kids and some of projects inspired us to try things at home (Drill Cart, Lawn Bott, etc…). About 2.5 years ago, my son wanted to build an auto-sensing mailbox for his science fair. It was about a 5 to 1 ratio of my time (prepping the work area, making sure all of the materials were available and cut to the right length, etc…) to his time (assembling the parts, copying the computer code), but it was well worth it – he might have learned some things and, most importantly, the project reinforced his belief that making things is really cool and fun.
After the science fair, I suggested that he submit this project to Make. He and I sent some time and wrote this into their on-line form:
Here’s an idea for a story for MAKE:
We made a mailbox that uses light signals to let you know when the mail arrives.
We used the Phidget 0/0/4 interface kit and the Phidget 8/8/8 interface kit. We wired a regular house lamp to the 0/0/4 and 2 force detectors to the 8/8/8. We glued the force detectors to the bottom of a mailbox. <p>
We then hooked both interface kits to the computer and wrote the code to handle the input event from the force detector and to turn on the 0/0/4 circut, which turns the lamp on.<p>
Once the external data is captured, you could do other things with the mail event – Sloan wants to hook up a camera in the mailbox and take a picture of the mailman as he put the mail in. I think a simple tweet might be an easier next step.<p>
The project is for a beginner – takes about 4-6 hours. There is appx 20 lines of computer code to write.<p>
Up next is to use Netduino and not use the PC….
Jamie & Sloan Dixon
To our surprise, the Editor And Chief wrote back almost immediately:
I would like to see a video of this in action!
Editor-in-chief of MAKE
We put together a quick video of what he did here and sent it in. Within 2 days, I got this back from the editor and chief:
This is great! I’d like to assign it. I can pay $250 for the article.
I can send you an assignment letter with fee and deadline info. First, could you please email me the following information:
— A two-sentence bio describing who you are (Note – If you want your email address to run in the magazine, incorporate it into your bio):
— Your name as you wish it to be printed
— Your legal name (who we make the check out to)
— Your address
— Your phone numbers
— Your preferred email address (and if you’d like it to run in the magazine)
Here is a link to a zip file with three important documents:
As you can image we were pretty excited. We filled out the forms and sent them in. I then wrote this in:
Is there someone I can work with to make sure the article is up to your standards? We are trying to follow your guidelines. We have never done anything like this before (can you tell we are excited?) and want to make sure we do thing right.
And we got the following response:
Paul XXXXX will be your editor. He’ll make sure the article looks and reads great in the magazine. It may be a while before he gets in touch, as this is slated for Vol 32 (October) and we are working on Vol 30 right now.
So then we spent a weekend writing an article for Make and sent it in. About a month later (March 2012), I sent in a reminder asking for the status. I got this from the editor in chief:
Got your email. Sorry for late reply. I’m cc’ing Paul so he can update you on the status of your project. We are still planning on running it.
I then sent in this video of my daughter to Mark and got the following response:
This looks cool, too! I’ll ask Paul to give you an assigment.
After more waiting (May 2012), I sent in a reminder asking for status from my editor (Paul) and I got this:
This email account is no longer being monitored: contact Gareth XXXXX at XXXXXX@oreilly.com
So I emailed the Editor and Chief
> I read the last Make – sorry we couldn’t make into the home automation
> edition. Hopefully some people enjoy the Phidget twist on the mailbox
> and the home security system. Is there anything else you need for the
> mailbox article? My daughter is almost done with school and she can
> write up the laser system – if you are still interested.
and I got this:
Yes we are running the article. I’m at a conference but when I get access to my schedule I’ll let you know which issue of Make it’s slated for.
So then a month later (June 2012), we got this
Hi James and Sloan,
We’re preparing your article for publication and we’re wondering, did you ever re-do the Auto Mailbox using Netduinos? It’s not practical to leave a PC out on the street, but I think if we do a Netduino version our readers will like it and build it!
Let me know ASAP please, we need to select articles for the next issue right away.
So then we answered the question, changed the Phidgets relay to a Netdunino and re-wrote the article. It was a fun weekend, but it took well, the entire weekend. We got this back:
Great work, guys! Simple, useful, novel sensors, relay … I like it a lot, it’s a nice twist on the other smart mailboxes some makers have made.
I have a few questions, can you help me resolve these ASAP?
1) Will Sloan be in 5th grade this fall? Our newsstand date for this issue is in October.
So we waited until October 2012 and when it was not in the issue, I emailed Make and I got this back:
I have to rework it as a "getting started with Netduino" article. It’s slated for Volume 33 now (on sale January 22 2013).
So more waiting until February 2013 when I got another email from Make with our article marked up
Here’s what we’re working with at the moment, I’m going to try to slip it into the mag ASAP. Can you look it over and make sure it’s OK, and answer any questions marked in red?
That is the last I heard and I am not really interested in pestering them any more about the article. My son hasn’t asked about the article since February. I assume that professional writers deal with this all of the time, but I figured Make might be different because they are not dealing with professional writers – we are professional other things that want to share our passion. Combine their treatment of me and my son with the fact that that the most of the projects are now waaay harder than they were two years ago (so we can’t even do them), I am dropping my subscription. I think Popular Mechanics might have a DYI section now? If so, I will start subscribing to them…